Lauren Spencer- In your post from the 7th, you did a very good job in establishing what is normal and how they can different ate in separate societies. I also liked in your first paragraph because of the fact that you ended it with a question. I think this really gives the reader an opportunity to reflect on what they just read, whether or not they’re going to come up with the answer you want is a different story, but at least you got them thinking. I thought you made good arguments for both sides, I understand you stance on this issue, but I feel that you giving you opinion took away from the part when you told about how nature could justify homosexual behaviors. Your post from the 5th, was interesting as you really emphasized the idea of what love actually is. I liked how you did it in your first paragraph and that was by asking the reader several questions, it doesn’t tell them directly what it is, instead it lets them figure out that it’s hard for love to have one meaning.
Morgan Paulson- The post from the 5th, I liked your organization, I thought it was a good idea to show what someone who has researched sexual relation. I think it really gave an idea to the reader of what things would be like if Fishers ideas were real. I also liked how you followed this with what you think would happen if her idea was implanted. You were able to give the reader idea that you thought it wasn’t a good idea without directly telling them this until the very end of the paragraph. A suggestion I would make is declaring what your main argument is at the beginning. Maybe put this a little before describing what Fisher’s view is. After you established your main idea then explain what Fisher thinks.
No comments:
Post a Comment