Morgan Paulson- I thought the opening to your blog on the 28th was really good, you first told about something in your life that was relevant to the question, and you were able to transition nicely into explaining how men and women communicate differently. Al though you had a nice opening and explanation, I think you kind of threw the part about how you could have resolved this issue to the side. It’s really only the last paragraph you talk about this. I would make sure that your post answers the question thoroughly and not have it be the last paragraph. In your blog from the 30th you again have an interesting way of writing an opening, I especially like the end of it where you ask a question. Like the post from the 28th, I don’t feel that you wrote enough about the actual question. You do a good job in going over his information and deciding if an alternative would work, but I’m not sure if answering the question at the end of all that is what the question wanted.
Lauren Spencer- Your blog from the 28th was interesting and you made good use of Tannin’s ideas in figuring out how you could have made less of a conflict of the situation. I think you could have been a little more specific to what ideas of Tannin’s you were using. I would suggest citing because if someone had read this who hadn’t read the article they wouldn’t know where these ideas were coming from. In your blog from the 30th I would suggest using the reading a little more when answering this kind of question. You made the post kind of personal, and that kind of went away from the idea of what this blog was supposed to be about. What I did like about this blog as you kind of made of personal, was that you did it without preaching, you were impartial.
No comments:
Post a Comment